2009

FieldView

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

No, the venture capital model is not broken. If the output has been upsetting of late then let’s double check the inputs.

What are some of the ingredients that have caused some to hold their nose? And more importantly, are there components we can control to create a better outcome? Key market inputs that are out of our control include (1) poor macroeconomic growth and demand (2) tight capital/debt markets and (3) withered IPO markets that limit high value exits. Given these are, unfortunately, part of what the model has to process, are there other elements we CAN alter as investors to ensure the “venture model” is still palatable?

When I consider our investment in FieldView Solutions, I’m convinced the answer is yes. FieldView is a software company that provides a solution to data center managers to better handle energy needs, capacity planning and risk mitigation of their critical assets. So what is it about FieldView that addresses these three negative market factors in such a way that makes me believe?

1. Take painkillers: For faltering economic growth, it’s tough to find sectors that haven’t been hurt by the downturn in one way or another. But those that have been more resilient are in markets wrestling with critical problems that require a solution even in downturns. The venture adage of funding painkillers instead of vitamins is doubly true in recessions.

Data centers are dealing with two separate problems that are only becoming more severe. The first is the increasing amount of data that these strategic assets need to process and store. The second is the increasing energy demand necessary to maintain these assets. A recent DOE report highlights both these problems when it indicates that energy use could double to more than 120 billion kWh from 2006 to 2011, equal to annual electricity costs of $7.4B. Neither of these problems is going away any time soon and since FieldView provides managers with transparency into both of these critical needs to enable better decision making, they’ve continued to grow in a “down market” by bringing on some of the largest financial, insurance, co-lo, and pharmaceutical companies as customers. The ROI and need of the product has been compelling, with examples of customers able to avoid unnecessary capex in the tens of millions of dollar range, minimize the amount of data center downtime through better load management, and reduce energy consumption through consolidating assets.

2. Go with capital efficiency: Given tight capital markets, companies with capital efficient business models are better suited. Capital efficiency has been a core investment mantra of SJF’s since the beginning and especially so when we consider our cleantech investments. Limiting the amount of capital ensures that both the entrepreneur and investor are more financially aligned and generate attractive returns even at modest exit valuations, which is a reality especially with IPO markets dried up. FieldView’s business model and design delivers this.

The software architecture and UI is highly flexible, cost efficiently scalable and user friendly, which enable both installations to take days not months and easy customer adoption across a variety of levels without complicated and costly training and support. The offering is configurable across hardware vendors and protocols to adapt easily to different customer needs while not being burdened by complex customization. This low cost to serve and lean business model means that significant additional capital investment will likely only be necessary for strategic reasons rather than as a matter of course.

3. Assume strategic exits: Given atrophied IPO markets, finding companies that have, or provide access to, high value assets that will be sought after by strategic investors paints a more reasonable exit scenario.

FieldView’s product is used by Fortune 1000 companies and resides on their networks and hardware worth tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. The software also connects two groups that have long operated separately – Facilities and IT – both of whom are critical decision making groups in the energy management and data center equation. These customers and the entrée FieldView provides to this valuable asset base and key decision makers can make the company strategically complimentary to a number of potential acquirers.

Obviously having a capital efficient business that solves a key market need in a sector that has acquisitive players isn’t automatically a recipe for success, but it’s certainly some of the right ingredients. Fred Dirla the company’s CEO and other senior members of management have deep expertise in and understanding of market needs. The references from some of the largest companies in their sectors praised Fred and his team’s ability to continuously innovate in anticipation of new market trends.

If a model isn’t giving you the results you expected to see, it’s always good to reflect on what inputs are going in. In an environment with some “down market” drivers to contend with, it’s even more important to be careful what other factors should be mixed in to ensure the right outcome. But if we’re able to do this, I think we’ll come to realize that, depending on the fund strategy, the venture model isn’t broken.

Arrun Kapoor

Read more about SJF Ventures’ investment in FieldView

China, the US South, and Copenhagen

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

Living in New York City for the fall after being a North Carolinian for three decades is giving me a widened perspective.   For one, walking around the city when the United Nations, the Clinton Global Initiative, and many heads of state are all meeting here creates gridlock in the streets!   New York seems a place of intensely local neighborhoods but also a world city, looking out from the harbor to the globe.    This plus my review of a recent China Greentech study, along with my special interest given my daughter being from China and our having traveled there, has gotten me thinking about the role of China and the US, particularly the South, in climate change.   A few of those thoughts:

  1. Climate change is accelerating and optimism about an international treaty to be negotiated in Copenhagen in December is waning given slow political progress on a low-carbon policy in US and China.   (See Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s opening remarks to the UN Climate Change Summit Plenary here yesterday.)
  2. China’s rapid economic growth is continuing, despite the recession, with the IMF predicting 8% GDP growth in China will the world has -1% GDP reduction and the US -3%. (International Monetary Fund, “World Economic Outlook Update, July 2009″.)
  3. China produces most of its electricity from coal, and adds as much electric generation (90 gigawatts, GW) in one year at the total electric generation in the United Kingdom (78 GW)
  4. China’s population is twice that of all of the US and Europe combined.
  5. China and the United States are the largest carbon polluters, each emitting about 20% of the world’s carbon emissions.   However, the US has only 5% of the world’s population while China has 20%.
  6. China will likely never agree to a binding international carbon reduction protocol unless the US agrees, despite encouraging carbon reduction and renewables growth voluntary goals stated by President Hu Jintao yesterday.
  7. US energy and climate legislation is stalled now in the Senate, and Southern Senators are a key group that is in opposition.
  8. The South has much to lose with global warming (witness Katrina) and much to gain in a low carbon economy – especially diversified employment in efficiency, recycling, solar, insulation, wind, sustainable agriculture, biomass, green IT and biotech companies.
  9. SJF can play a role in promoting the green, low-carbon economy as an upside opportunity for the country, and particularly the Southeast.  (As we have done in our Green Economy Summit in NC in June, our Cleantech CEO Panels in NYC, the REBNs, through cleantech portfolio companies such as groSolar, RealWinWin, CleanScapes, Intechra … with many more to come).

Those are my Manhattan musings for today, I welcome your comments!

Dave Kirkpatrick

SJF Employee Financial Stability Webinar – July 14, 2 PM EST

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

Next Tuesday afternoon, SJF Advisory Services hosts the latest in a series of webinars designed to help businesses improve financial performance and employee engagement. This new webinar will look at ways employers can help workers better their financial situation.

As the global financial crisis continues, smart businesses will do what they can to help address their employees’ financial stress. Increased costs for basic necessities such as food, fuel, health care and housing are stretching families to the limit. Studies show employee financial problems result in lower job productivity, increased absenteeism, increased substance abuse, and high turnover – all of which impact a company’s profitability.

Webinar presenter Janet Raffel, from JE Raffel & Associates, has compiled some staggering numbers about workers’ financial circumstances:

• $8,400 – the average revolving debt carried by Americans
• 41 percent – the share of Americans that give themselves a C, D or F in personal financial literacy
• Nearly 131,000 – the number of bankruptcies filed in March 2009
• 90 percent – the share of a workplace likely to be under some financial stress during today’s turbulent economy

During next week’s webinar, find out:

• Warning signs of employee financial stress
• Low-cost local and national resources your business can tap
• Strategies used by leading entrepreneurial employer Ryla, like their paper-free payroll system, a “cashless cafe,” and financial education workshops

Other presenters will include Karen Clay from Ryla, Alison Yonas from Latino Community Credit Union, and Larrey Riddle from MACED. Anne Claire Broughton from SJF Advisory Services will moderate the event.

The webinar begins at 2 PM EST. Find out more and register for the event at: http://www.sjfund.com/index.php?id=297

Summit Strategy Sessions Offer Useful Insights – Great Ideas, Best Practices for Entrepreneurs

Monday, June 22nd, 2009

Day two of the SJF Summit on the New Green Economy offered participants the chance to have a facilitated conversation about challenges and opportunities in the new green economy.  Sessions were held on issues that entrepreneurs face, the needs of rural and urban communities for economic development, and issues unique to the Triangle region of North Carolina.  We’ve picked out and posted to this blog some of the most interesting and useful insights from these sessions and paraphrased or quoted the participants.   Please feel free to leave your own comments or suggestions!

ENTREPRENEURS OFFER GREAT IDEAS, BEST PRACTICES

What do you need to know to be a successful entrepreneur in the green business space?  Lots of great ideas were offered up at the Entrepreneurship Strategy Session during SJF’s Green Economy Summit.  Top of mind for entrepreneurs: every relationship matters.

Other nuggets of advice:
•    Don’t despair if capital investment seems to only go to the big guys.  Our panel argued that micro-lending is an available, viable option for smaller firms.
•    Notes one participant: there are many new debt options. Lightly collateralized loans up to $50,000, and lending up to $200,000, might be an option. While this might not be much money for capital-intensive companies, it can be helpful for service businesses.
•    When you’re short on people-power or fresh ideas, tap business school students.  Our panel found them to be eager and socially motivated.  Moreover, to have students working on a discrete project that relates to their studies can be a real win-win.
•    Work on that elevator pitch!  As one participant emphasized: “say in a few words what the market opportunity is. Entrepreneurs have too many words and grand ideas. Instead, say ‘here’s the need, and here’s how we’ll address it in a differentiated way.’”
•    Be clear about the shortest path to revenue and breakeven point.  Small and income-generating is better than big and in the red.
•    Find an investor who cares about the problems you are working to solve. “If you’ve got them by the heart, the wallet is close to follow.”

The entrepreneurs also had ideas as to the most pressing needs for budding green entrepreneurs:
•    The need for experienced mentors: “How can we connect people with a business background to mentor those who have the heart but no business experience?”
•    The need for seed funding: “Many environmental or mission-driven businesses don’t fit the formula for lending because they don’t have a track record. But they’re visionaries, and they’re the ones we [the market] need to figure out how to fund.”
•    The need for good metrics to measure social and environmental performance.

Summit Strategy Sessions Offer Useful Insights – Growing a Green Triangle

Monday, June 22nd, 2009

Day two of the SJF Summit on the New Green Economy offered participants the chance to have a facilitated conversation about challenges and opportunities in the new green economy.  Sessions were held on issues that entrepreneurs face, the needs of rural and urban communities for economic development, and issues unique to the Triangle region of North Carolina.  We’ve picked out and posted to this blog some of the most interesting and useful insights from these sessions and paraphrased or quoted the participants.   Please feel free to leave your own comments or suggestions!

BUILDING THE NEW GREEN ECONOMY IN NORTH CAROLINA’S TRIANGLE REGION
The Triangle Region strategy session participants identified some local resources for green business entrepreneurs including:
•    The Sustainable North Carolina Business Council
•    North Carolina Sustainable Entrepreneurs Group
•    NC Board of Science & Technology
•    Advanced Energy

Some of the next steps that the SJF Green Economy Summit strategists considered to develop green business in the Triangle included:
•    Organize like-minded investors
•    Look for ways to collaborate
•    Develop great business plans
•    Have more say in policy development
•    Collect information for faith-based initiatives embracing the green movement

Summit Strategy Sessions Offer Useful Insights – Potential of Rural Communities

Monday, June 22nd, 2009

Day two of the SJF Summit on the New Green Economy offered participants the chance to have a facilitated conversation about challenges and opportunities in the new green economy.  Sessions were held on issues that entrepreneurs face, the needs of rural and urban communities for economic development, and issues unique to the Triangle region of North Carolina.  We’ve picked out and posted to this blog some of the most interesting and useful insights from these sessions and paraphrased or quoted the participants.    Please feel free to leave your own comments or suggestions!

IN RURAL COMMUNITIES MONEY REALLY DOES GROW ON TREES

Here’s a thoughtful take-away from the SJF Summit strategy session on rural economic development: the glass is half full, not half empty.  In terms of green jobs potential, rural communities have great bioenergy and other assets, and are rich in natural capital.  However, new strategies for marketing and corporate development are needed so that private money, including venture capital and angels, can effectively reach small-or-medium-sized businesses in rural economies.

The Summit strategists concluded that rural communities may have missed the Internet explosion, but they don’t need to – and shouldn’t – miss the ‘green’ explosion.  How can these communities get in the game?
•    Increase access to capital.  One reason interest and enthusiasm from investors is lacking is because the capital needs are smaller in rural areas than elsewhere. One potential area of interest to investors could be community infrastructure.
•    Develop workforce training in new skills related to new green industries
•    Develop low-tech employment opportunities in green industries for entry-level employees
•    Recognize rural and urban needs are different!  Urban strategies may not work in rural communities.

Rural communities have big potential to develop their natural capital assets. One attendee noted that Latin American countries are beginning to protect their forests rather than cutting down the trees and are then using carbon credits to trade in the European market. U.S rural communities now have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to respond to the interest of the energy industry in biomass production by exploiting their bioenergy assets.

The lack of a trained workforce and matched skill sets are two of the biggest hurdles for rural communities. There may be lessons to learn here from urban communities, which use empowerment strategies to build capacity through leadership.  The best organizations are market-based networks, like farmers’ cooperatives, or are organized around a sector (energy products, forestry products) to serve large market.

Words of wisdom: to be successful, the regions themselves need to organize to develop an infrastructure.  One key need is on-the-ground leadership that’s sustained over time.

SJF Summit Media Coverage

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

SJF’s Summit on the New Green Economy attracted a great deal of attention from the news media.  Cleantech, sustainability and green jobs are all compelling themes that draw press coverage.  Check out what various media outlets are saying about the conference at these links below:

The Herald Sun: SJF Ventures Brings Conference Home

Independent Weekly: Green Businesses, Earning Green

The News & Observer: Conference Set on Green Economy

Triangle Business Journal: SJF ‘Going Green,’ with $50M-$75M Fundraiser

Summit Ends, But Work on New Green Economy Just Beginning

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

After a successful two days, our SJF Summit has come to a close.

We thank all our panelists, attendees and SJF staff for an inspiring and informative event.  Those in attendance were clearly fired up about our emergent green economy, and this Summit provided many tools, techniques and best practices that investors, economic developers, entrepreneurs, government officials and others will be able to apply to their ventures.

We hope you are enjoying our new blog and welcome your comments and feedback.  Let us know what content you’re looking for and we’ll work hard to provide it.  This is only the beginning for cleantechinvesting.com.  Our Summit proved to be a great launching pad for the site, but stay tuned for much more cleantech and green jobs information from this resource and other SJF blogs.

As we look ahead, don’t forget to sign up for SJF’s upcoming Employee Financial Stability Webinar on June 16, 2009.  You can register and learn more at www.sjfund.com.

Thanks for reading!  Stay tuned for much more from SJF.

Jeff Wolfe’s Call to “Save the Planet”

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

Jeff Wolfe had a simple call to arms for SJF Summit attendees to wrap up the two-day event this afternoon: go develop and promote alternative energy in order to “save the planet.”

“We will win not by losing our senses, but by finally gaining control of them,” said Wolfe, CEO of Vermont-based groSolar. “This is the moment.  Let’s go do it.”

Wolfe ended his lunch keynote with this inspirational message.  Before he got there, he laid out a bleak picture of the current times: a huge, crippling recession, global warming and a dependence on oil for energy.  But all of these trends, Wolfe noted, open up great opportunities for wholesale change.

Wolfe and his wife, Dori, began groSolar, an SJF portfolio company, in 1998.  The solar energy firm has exploded and now has 200 workers.

“GroSolar is a fantastic example of what our economic system can do and repeat,” he said.

Wolfe advocated for “endeavor” capital over venture capital.  The distinction, he said, is that venture capital sometimes makes a problem in order to solve it, while endeavor capital would be organized around fixing existing problems.

So how do businesses, investors and others move forward in promoting sustainable energy sources?  Wolfe had a few ideas.  Among them: mission statements should include the mantra, “in harmony with the Earth”; the public sector should make investments without expecting an immediate return; business should ditch its old ways and find new techniques; and labor interests need to be involved in dialogue.

Naumoff Helps Summit Attendees Sift Through Stimulus

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

Right before lunch, SJF Summit attendees could go to a variety of information and strategy sessions.  These groups were intended to be conversational and to help investors, economic developers and others get useful information they could apply to their efforts to build the new green economy.  Here is a look at the “Accessing Stimulus Funds” strategy session:

Ernst & Young’s Paul Naumoff knows the federal stimulus is a complex system of funding.

“It really is a daunting task just to understand (how the funds) add up,” he said.

Naumoff helped SJF Summit attendees make sense of some of the $787 billion in federal funding during a strategy session before lunch.  He focused on money that businesses and other entities can tap for tax credits and other incentives.  Much of that funding is available to spur alternative energy research and implementation, he said.

Among the available pockets of money are $2.3 billion in tax credits for makers of advanced energy infrastructure.  He said the federal government will consider many factors as they sift through grant applications, including the degree to which an area needs a stimulus.

Naumoff noted that while the stimulus programs are carefully constructed to prevent entities from “double dipping,” there are additional state and local incentive packages available that can help businesses get more assistance in developing and deploying green technologies.

Naumoff went over a number of different federal grant programs.  One provides incentives for battery technology in alternative vehicles.  “We need to improve the technology, so they’re looking for opportunities there,” he said.

He noted that while there is lots of money directly at the federal level, attendees could have greater success pursuing millions in funds at the state level.  Those state dollars are allocated from the federal government.

For instance, he said North Carolina’s state energy office received $266 million in stimulus funding from the U.S. Department of Energy.  Those money breaks down as follows: $132 million for weatherization; $76 for state energy programs; and $58 million for energy efficiency and conservation block grants for local governments.

While quick to note that he doesn’t know all of the best approaches to accessing these funds, Naumoff did give a few pointers.  For example, he said stimulus fund applicants should have good documentation and give a narrative to explain the need for monies in their local economy.

“You need to be very complete and accurate,” he said. “You just need to make sure you do all your paperwork.”

Attendees also were able to hear about various Web sites that allow users to learn about funding and incentives.  Those include: grants.gov, fedconnect.net, ccr.gov and dsireusa.org.

The strategy session allowed attendees to jump in with questions and comments.  One attendee offered the greater suggestion that applicants begin with the back of the document and work their way to the front; he said that approach could be better for timing reasons as applicants try to turn in all of the paperwork.

Naumoff also took time to discuss examples of strong state-based programs.  He named Tennessee’s Clean Energy Technology Grant, the “Renew Energy” initiative and Ohio’s Advanced Energy Program as case studies.

The stimulus passed just months ago, and Naumoff noted that hardly any of the money had been spent at this point.

“Certainly in the next 24 months there will be a lot more dollars flowing,” he said.